The prevailing opinion among hockey
fans in Detroit is that the Red Wings goalie doesn’t win games, he merely loses
them. He won’t win you a playoff series, but he sure will foul one up for you.
The goalie in the Winged Wheel is
like the closer in the Old English D—he’s guilty until proven innocent. Then
when he goes back out there, he has to prove his innocence all over again.
There have been more thankless
jobs. The gallows executioner and the tax man come to mind. After that, I’m not
so sure.
It happens every night after a Red
Wings loss. Turn on talk radio and listen to the therapist of the night—also
known as the host—talk the city from jumping off the Ambassador Bridge.
There might be a beef or two about
the forwards not back checking or the scorers not scoring or the defensemen
coughing the puck up. But those calls are just the opening act.
It all comes back to the goalie.
“Jimmy Howard? I wouldn’t let him
play goalie for my kid’s Pee Wee team!”
“We’ll never win the Stanley Cup
with this guy Howard in net!”
“What has Jimmy Howard ever won?”
“Howard can’t get it done in the
playoffs!”
The Red Wings might have lost, 2-1,
but it’s still Howard’s fault, somehow.
The wolves were out again this
week, as news came to light that the Red Wings are about to outfit Howard with
a six-year, $31.8 million contract. It should be signed any day now, after some
final details are hammered out.
The therapists on talk radio,
namely Bob Wojnowski and Jamie Samuelsen, had a bunch of apoplectics on their
hands Thursday evening when the topic of discussion turned to Howard and his
soon-to-be new contract.
The bridge jumpers were aghast.
They didn’t like the length of the deal. They thought GM Ken Holland was
“overpaying” for one of his own. They didn’t like the money, as if they were
each being shaken down for a share of the payout.
Mainly, they didn’t like the idea
of Jimmy Howard playing goalie for the Red Wings for the next six years.
Naturally, the bridge jumpers
didn’t offer any alternatives. They paid their fee—being put on hold—so all
they wanted was their say, i.e., to bitch.
Jimmy Howard, the bridge jumpers
said, hasn’t proven himself worthy of such a lavish deal. He can’t win in the
playoffs, they said. He doesn’t make the “big” save when you need him to make
it.
One caller even said, “Whenever I
see a guy coming in on Howard on a breakaway, I automatically count it as a
goal.”
It’s amazing how much hockey these
folks purport to see, watching it with blinders on.
The $5.3 (roughly) million that
Howard is set to get per year is about on par with what goalies in the upper
echelon in the NHL are being paid these days. It’s neither an extravagant
contract, nor is Howard getting jobbed by the Red Wings.
In other words, if the Red Wings
chose to look outside the organ-eye-zay-shun for a veteran goalie, they’d pay
about the same amount of Mike Ilitch’s pizza dough as they’re prepared to give
Howard.
I don’t know what NHL games the
bridge jumpers have been watching this season, because it sure doesn’t appear
that they’ve been watching the Red Wings.
If they had, they’d see that on
many a night—too many a night, really—Jimmy Howard has been the best player on
the ice for the Red Wings. Sometimes the best for both teams.
These aren’t the salad days of the
mid-to-late 1990s and well into the 2000s, when the Red Wings could score four
goals without breaking a sweat. The roster today isn’t exactly bursting with
World Class players.
Too often the Red Wings struggle to
score. Their power play didn’t score a goal on the road this season until
almost 40 chances had gone into the books.
Howard, really, has been forced too
often to be every bit as good as Dominik Hasek, Terry Sawchuk and Roger Crozier
all rolled into one. With his team’s “offense,” Howard has the margin for error
of a heart surgeon.
It’s appropriate that the Red Wings
wear blood red at home, because that’s what the fans thirst for, if Howard
doesn’t blank the opposition or limit them to one goal, tops.
The Cup-winning Red Wings teams
didn’t need a Hall of Famer in goal, though they had one in Hasek. Their potent
offense would overwhelm the other team. There were a lot of nights when you
would need to score five goals to beat the Red Wings.
Thursday night was a case in point.
The Red Wings etched out a 2-1 lead
early in the third period over the San Jose Sharks. As usual, it was like
pulling teeth to score.
The Sharks tied the game, which
went into overtime. Neither team scored in the extra five minutes, so off they
went to one of those lovely shootouts that decide games nowadays.
Pavel Datsyuk started the shootout
with a nifty goal. The Sharks scored on their turn. Then the Red Wings failed,
but so did the Sharks. The Red Wings failed a second time.
That left the final shot up to the
Sharks. A goal and the game would be over. Another save by Howard, and the
shootout would drone on.
Patrick Marleau skated in on Howard
and made a little deke and a deft stick handling move, and the puck was between
Howard’s pads. Game over.
Howard skated off the ice and
slammed his big goalie paddle against the glass in frustration, his margin for
error again virtually non-existent.
Frankly, I don’t know what the
bridge jumping hockey fans in Detroit want from Jimmy Howard. The team that
skates in front of him isn’t anywhere near the team that skated in front of
Osgood, Vernon, Hasek or even Manny Legace.
Howard has to be the Red Wings’
best player on most nights. And many times, he has been. The six-year contract
the team is about to give him is reflective of that.
The Red Wings are now set in goal.
They can start working on getting guys who can put the puck in the net.
Wouldn’t that be nice?
1 comment:
Hi,
I'm sorry for the trouble. Would it be possible to have "Sports Memorabilia" link remove from your site?
THanks
Post a Comment